Posted By Matthew Jokajtys on November 18, 2014
Despite – even because of – their useful properties, perfluorinated chemicals (“PFCs”) are increasingly thought to be dangerous for the environment, and potentially humans. PFCs are manmade substances with the ability to repel both water and oils, and are responsible for the stain repellant properties of your rug, the sauce-resistant properties of your takeout container, and the nonstick properties of your frying pan.
But PFCs are also suspected carcinogens that do not easily break down in the environment and accumulate in organisms over time. Despite an EPA program founded in 2006 to achieve a 95% reduction in emissions of certain PFCs, they are increasingly observed in ecosystems around the country and around the world. They are even being detected in human blood and breast milk. (more…)
Posted By Jessica Zalin on October 24, 2014
The U.S. EPA easily rejected Governor Andrew Cuomo’s loan request, refraining from calling it chutzpah of the highest order: the Governor tried to pass off bridge construction as an environmental project worthy of the federal Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF). (more…)
Posted By Matthew Jokajtys on October 20, 2014
As most folks in the commercial real estate industry know, the Bona Fide Prospective Purchaser exemption from liability under the federal Superfund law is a very useful tool. Accordingly, a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment is standard practice for nearly every purchase of commercial real estate because it helps to satisfy EPA’s “All Appropriate Inquiries” requirement for obtaining BFPP status and avoiding the often harsh liability associated with Superfund.
However, a final rule published by the EPA on October 6, 2014 clarifies the acceptable protocol for a Phase I ESA. Effective October 6, 2015, EPA’s AAI regulations will only reference the 2013 standard procedure for a Phase I ESA (ASTM E1527-13). EPA is formally removing the reference to the 2005 standard (ASTM E1527-05) from the AAI regulations due to confusion over what the 2005 standard required. Even so, EPA has delayed the effective date of the rule by one year so that any ongoing Phase I ESAs using the 2005 standard can be concluded. (more…)
Posted By Jessica Zalin on October 17, 2014
Over the past decade, the changing climate has contributed to an increase in the number of extreme weather events throughout the world. New York State is no exception. Here, we rely on plentiful water resources to provide our necessities such as agriculture, energy, and drinking water. However, this makes New York particularly vulnerable to these drastic weather conditions. The effects of climate change upon our community cannot be ignored. (more…)
Posted By Matthew Jokajtys on October 15, 2014
The scales of justice are a ubiquitous symbol of equality and fairness under the law that date back to ancient times. One of the most common tools lawyers use to pursue the ideal of fairness and equality is the doctrine of equitable estoppel. Equitable estoppel works to preserve fairness by preventing bad actors from benefitting from their malfeasance. For example, if you knowingly misrepresent certain facts to the opposing attorney in a negotiation, and that attorney relies on that misrepresentation to enter into a harmful deal, she could later void the deal using the doctrine of equitable estoppel.
The doctrine of equitable estoppel is almost always invoked in commercial litigation between private parties, but it is generally not available against governmental entities like the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. From time to time, parties try to prevail by invoking equitable estoppel in litigation against the DEC, and they usually fail. The latest case is no different, and arises in the context of a legal challenge to DEC’s decision to issue a Freshwater Wetlands Permit. (more…)
Posted By Matthew Jokajtys on October 7, 2014
When someone says the word “contract,” what comes to mind? For most, it would probably be a signed piece of paper that sets out certain legally enforceable promises made between two parties. But oral contracts can exist, too, and an oral contract can be just as enforceable as a written contract. The problem is that proving the contents of an oral contract is difficult precisely because there is no written record of the agreement.
The difficulty of proving the contents of an oral contract increases exponentially in the context of a complicated, multiyear environmental investigation and remediation. The recent case of Volunteers of Am. of W. N.Y., Inc. v. Rochester Gas & Elec. Corp., 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94447 provides some important lessons on how to document rights and responsibilities in an environmental remediation. To borrow a phrase from the criminal law world: what you say can be used against you in a court of law… (more…)
Posted By Jessica Zalin on September 30, 2014
After settling with EPA and having its settlement upheld in court, a potentially responsible party (PRP) is free from liability to all other PRPs given notice of that proposed settlement under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA, or Superfund). This principle, long recognized as key to CERCLA’s successful performance, was recently affirmed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in its ASARCO, LLC v. Union Pacific Railroad Company decision. (more…)
Posted By Jessica Zalin on September 19, 2014
Though the Endangered Species Act has very strong prohibitory language, in practice its bark is sometimes much worse than its bite. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit’s recent decision in The Aranas Project v. Shaw, et al. has preserved the statute’s status as a mere “paper tiger” by reversing a district court ruling which had the potential to preserve the dwindling wild whooping crane population. (more…)
Posted By Jessica Zalin on September 10, 2014
In a groundbreaking verdict, a Texas jury has awarded damages to a family for injuries suffered due to air pollution from hydraulic fracturing (“hydrofracking”) drilling operations. This verdict follows almost inexorably from the rise in popularity in the past decade of hydrofracking as a means of natural gas production, which was quickly met with legal challenges. Between 2009 and 2013, the civil litigation landscape was flooded with lawsuits alleging toxic tort claims stemming from hydrofracking activities. (more…)
Posted By Matthew Jokajtys on September 2, 2014
Fixed contaminant standards need not be reached, much less exceeded, in order to cause an injury that courts can recognize. An intermediate appeals court in New York has ruled that the Suffolk County Water Authority may sue chemical companies for groundwater contamination even where the contamination does not exceed an EPA drinking water standard known as a Maximum Contaminant Level. However, this may be a pyrrhic victory, as that same court also ruled that many of the SCWA’s claims were too late under New York’s three-year statute of limitations for injuries from latent effects of exposure to harmful substances.
While the state’s highest court could still weigh in on this case, this decision is a key reminder of the important role that groundwater data plays in determining when a claim for groundwater contamination is timely. (more…)