Air Pollution – Soil Vapor Intrusion (6)
Brownfields Cleanup (13)
Environmental Contamination & General Liability in New York (7)
Environmental Law Video (1)
Environmental Permits (3)
Environmental Risk & Insurance (5)
Federal Environmental Law (36)
Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) (13)
Lawyer & Attorney Referrals (2)
Media Appearances (1)
New York Navigation Law (15)
New York State Environmental Law (35)
NY Environmental Statutes, Codes, Regulations (19)
NY Oil Spill Act (14)
NY State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) (7)
Oil Spill Cases (8)
Press Releases (4)
Real Estate Transactions & Environmental Law (29)
Sick Building Syndrome (SBS) (5)
Superfund (CERCLA & State Superfund) (26)
Toxic Substance Control Act – TSCA (1)
James J. Periconi, Esq. | June 9, 2008
Pollen, dust, fungi, industrial pollutants, and general vehicle exhaust are common outdoor sources of indoor air pollution. Other sources include exhaust from vehicles on nearby roads or in parking lots or garages, loading docks, odors from dumpsters, unsanitary debris near outdoor air intakes, and cigarette smoke from office workers now required in most cities to [...]
James J. Periconi, Esq. | April 8, 2008
This most common of representations and warranties is most often abused. Buyer or tender may initially want a flat representation that there are not now and never have been any Hazardous Materials on the premises or any operations that generate, use, treat, store, or dispose of Hazardous Materials. Difficulties that immediately arise include
Extension of New York State Fracking Moratorium Passes State Assembly, But its Ultimate Fate is Unclear Destruction of Oil Spill Investigation Data Ruled Not Sufficiently Prejudicial to Warrant the Dismissal of a Cost Recovery Action Under Navigation Law § 12 EPA to Defend its “Proposed Plan” for Remediating the Gowanus Canal Superfund Site During Public Meetings on January 23 and 24, 2013 DEC “Incidental Take” Permit Regulations Survive Challenge “Fracking NY” Blog Series: Update – Federal Regulations 11th Circuit Decision Follows that of Niagara v. Mohawk: Under CERCLA, Parties Who Enter Into Consent Decree with Government Are Limited to a § 113(f) Contribution Claim 