Air Pollution – Soil Vapor Intrusion (6)
Brownfields Cleanup (13)
Environmental Contamination & General Liability in New York (7)
Environmental Law Video (1)
Environmental Permits (3)
Environmental Risk & Insurance (5)
Federal Environmental Law (36)
Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) (13)
Lawyer & Attorney Referrals (2)
Media Appearances (1)
New York Navigation Law (15)
New York State Environmental Law (35)
NY Environmental Statutes, Codes, Regulations (19)
NY Oil Spill Act (14)
NY State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) (7)
Oil Spill Cases (8)
Press Releases (4)
Real Estate Transactions & Environmental Law (29)
Sick Building Syndrome (SBS) (5)
Superfund (CERCLA & State Superfund) (26)
Toxic Substance Control Act – TSCA (1)
James J. Periconi, Esq. | September 28, 2008
So, who is responsible for mitigating this soil vapor intrusion? The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) describes the conditions under which the state will conduct the vapor intrusion evaluations and the order in which the sites will be assessed. If exposures represent a concern due to indoor sources, then the state will [...]
James J. Periconi, Esq. | September 21, 2008
Today we continue our discussion on soil vapor intrusion. Some states like New York have developed detailed vapor intrusion guidance of their own. New York’s guidance explicitly raises concerns about reliance on modeling and exterior soil vapor screening and encourages indoor and sub-slab sampling where there is a reason to believe that vapor intrusion may [...]
Extension of New York State Fracking Moratorium Passes State Assembly, But its Ultimate Fate is Unclear Destruction of Oil Spill Investigation Data Ruled Not Sufficiently Prejudicial to Warrant the Dismissal of a Cost Recovery Action Under Navigation Law § 12 EPA to Defend its “Proposed Plan” for Remediating the Gowanus Canal Superfund Site During Public Meetings on January 23 and 24, 2013 DEC “Incidental Take” Permit Regulations Survive Challenge “Fracking NY” Blog Series: Update – Federal Regulations 11th Circuit Decision Follows that of Niagara v. Mohawk: Under CERCLA, Parties Who Enter Into Consent Decree with Government Are Limited to a § 113(f) Contribution Claim 