“Fracking NY” Blog Series: Part 2 – Summary of DEC’s 2011 Revised Draft SGEIS

Posted By on November 15, 2011

As mentioned in our last NY Fracking Series post, hydraulic fracturing as a method of extracting natural gas is nothing new in New York State.  But the type of high-volume horizontal hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking,” now being considered for the Marcellus Shale formation in New York is new.  That’s why it has triggered a revision of the State’s environmental review of the issue and a revision to its regulations of natural gas drilling.  This post will summarize the State’s recent Environmnetal Impact Study on the impacts of fracking in New York State to human health and the environment. (more…)

Bankruptcy Does Not Discharge All Liability to Cleanup a Contaminated Site: Part II

Posted By on November 7, 2011

In our last post, “Bankruptcy Does Not Discharge All Liability to Cleanup a Contaminated Site: Part I,” we discussed the background of In re Mark IV Industries, Inc., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110595 (S.D.N.Y., Sept. 28, 2011), describing the events that led up to the filing of the lawsuit and the Bankruptcy Court’s decision.  In this post, we will discuss the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on appeal. (more…)

Bankruptcy Does Not Discharge All Liability to Cleanup a Contaminated Site: Part I

Posted By on October 31, 2011

The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York recently confirmed that a party’s liability to clean up a contaminated property was not discharged as part of a Chapter 11 reorganization, since such liability was not a “claim” under the Bankruptcy Code. See In re Mark IV Industries, Inc., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110595 (S.D.N.Y., Sept. 28, 2011). (more…)

“Fracking NY” Blog Series: Part 1 – Overview of Fracking in the Marcellus Shale Region of New York

Posted By on October 25, 2011

Introduction to Periconi, LLC’s “Fracking NY” Blog Series

Periconi, LLC does not represent clients on any side of this, the most significant environmental controversy in New York at this time – not the companies drilling for gas, or property owners who have signed leases (some of whom now regret that they did so), or the towns where such property lies.  Thus, we feel that we can express an objective voice on the controversy surrounding high-volume hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking,” in the Marcellus Shale region of New York.  So to that end, we have decided to present a series of blog posts covering the issues. (more…)

EPA Issues Interim Guidelines for Urban Agriculture on Brownfield Sites

Posted By on October 18, 2011

Urban agriculture is exploding in cities – large and small – throughout the nation.  In many cities, local land use laws and zoning ordinances are being amended or drafted to support this new-found passion.  But with precious “green” space in cities (and rooftops in limited supply), many urban farmers may be forced to turn to contaminated spaces, i.e., brownfields, for their farming needs.  But can these farmers ensure that these brownfield spaces are clean enough; how clean should soil be to be clean for farming? (more…)

Owners of Automobile Repair Shop Found Strictly Liable for Petroleum Discharge under NY Oil Spill Act

Posted By on October 11, 2011

If you’re familiar with the harsh reality of property owner liability under the New York State Navigation Law’s Oil Spill Act, this headline shouldn’t raise any eyebrows.  However, the holding of State of New York v. C.J. Burth Services, Inc., 79 A.D.3d 1298, 915 N.Y.S.2d 174 (N.Y. App. 3rd Dep’t 2010), once again confirms the Draconian nature of strict liability for property owners in Spill Act cases. (more…)

Sole Shareholder of Company that Owned Contaminated Site Found Liable as a “Current Operator” under CERLCA

Posted By on October 3, 2011

In Litgo New Jersey, Inc. v. Martin, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2033 (D.N.J. Jan. 7, 2011) (denying Motion for Rehearing), the sole shareholder of company (a single-purpose entity) that owned a contaminated property was found liable as a “current operator” under CERCLA § 107(a) because he had “actual control over the day-to-day operations on the [property], including oversight and control over remedial activities carried out by [environmental remediation companies].” (more…)

U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Attack on CERCLA’s Constitutionality

Posted By on September 20, 2011

On June 6, 2011, the Supreme Court of the United States ended a decade of litigation when it denied a writ of certiorari (i.e., refused to review) a 2010 decision of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeal which affirmed the trial court’s decision deny General Electric’s (“GE”) attack on the constitutionality of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“EPA”) authority to issue Unilateral Administrative Orders (“UAOs”) under section 106 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”).  (more…)

DEC Reports Increase in Brownfields Applications and Approvals; NYS Bar’s Efforts to Improve the Program Overall

Posted By on September 13, 2011

The DEC reported that it received 46 Brownfields Cleanup Program (“BCP”) applications during 2010-2011, an increase of 15% from the previous year.  DEC approved 38 of those applications, up from 26 from the year before. This is good news both for developers and property owners, as well as for our communities and the environment. (more…)

Failure to Specify Specific Contaminant in Notice of Intent to Sue Kills RCRA Claims

Posted By on September 7, 2011

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals threw out two claims under RCRA for failure to specify the specific contaminants alleged to cause the complained-of harm in the Notice of Intent to Sue. (more…)