The Second Circuit decides another CERCLA contribution case in Niagara Mohawk v. Chevron (Part III)

| July 15, 2010

As seen in our prior posts on Niagara Mohawk v. Chevron, 596 F.3d 112, in the two appeals and remands prior to the Second Circuit’s February decision, the District Court failed to properly address Niagara Mohawk’s (NiMo’s) argument under § 113(f)(3)(B), asserting that it has a

The Second Circuit decides another CERCLA contribution case in Niagara Mohawk v. Chevron (Part II)

| June 28, 2010

Our last post discussed the Second Circuit’s recent decision in Niagara Mohawk v. Chevron, 596 F.3d 112 (2d Cir. Feb 24, 2010).  We left off when the District Court was about to review its prior decision in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper Industries v. Aviall Services (“Aviall”). The Aviall Court held that [...]

The Second Circuit decides another CERCLA contribution case in Niagara Mohawk v. Chevron (Part I)

| June 3, 2010

The Second Circuit’s recent decision in Niagara Mohawk Power Corp v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc., 596 F.3d 112 (2d Cir. Feb 24, 2010), is a study (yet again) in the claims available to private parties to

How do the terrible Gulf oil spill & two contaminated New York waterways compare?

| May 28, 2010

I’m speaking about the Gulf of Mexico oil crisis that began in late April, of course.  Few environmental catastrophes have shocked the nation more than the huge, continuing, unremitting flow of many thousands of gallons per hour of oil for seemingly an interminable period, with no end in sight.  The Deepwater Horizon drilling rig blew

EPA lists Gowanus Canal on the National Priorities List

| March 10, 2010

On March 2, 2010, the EPA listed the Gowanus Canal in Brooklyn on the National Priorities List (NPL), making it a federal Superfund site.  The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation urged EPA to consider

The Supreme Court Clarifies the Requirements for “Arranger” Liability and Allocation of Liability in CERCLA Cases – Part IV.

| December 9, 2009

Following our posts on the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United States, No. 07-1601, –U.S.– (U.S. May 4, 2009) (“BNSF”), this post will discuss implications of this decision on apportionment in Superfund cases as various commentators (including this one) see it.

The Supreme Court Clarifies the Requirements for “Arranger” Liability and Allocation of Liability in CERCLA Cases – Part III.

| November 13, 2009

Following our recent posts on the Supreme Court’s decision in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United States, No. 07-1601, –U.S.– (U.S. May 4, 2009) (“BNSF“), this post will discuss the implications of

Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United States: The Supreme Court Clarifies the Requirements for “Arranger” Liability and Allocation of Liability in CERCLA Cases – Part II.

| August 31, 2009

Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United States: The Supreme Court Clarifies the Requirements for “Arranger” Liability and Allocation of Liability in CERCLA Cases – Part II. As discussed in our prior posting, the Supreme Court recently clarified the requirements for “arranger” liability and allocation of liability in CERCLA cases in Burlington Northern [...]

The Supreme Court Clarifies the Requirements for “Arranger” Liability and Allocation of Liability in CERCLA Cases – Part I.

| July 9, 2009

Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United States: The Supreme Court Clarifies the Requirements for “Arranger” Liability and Allocation of Liability in CERCLA Cases – Part I. The Supreme Court recently clarified the requirements for “arranger” liability and allocation of liability in CERCLA cases in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [...]

The Western District of Washington Leaves a PRP without a Remedy, but Upholds the Broader Policy Objectives of CERCLA.

| May 26, 2009

The Western District of Washington also recently followed the holding from the Aviall case.  See Port of Tacoma v. Todd Shipyards Corp., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5884 (W.D.Wa., January 14, 2009). The Port of Tacoma sued Todd Shipyards in a contribution action under CERCLA § 113(f) for