James J. Periconi, Esq. | July 15, 2010
As seen in our prior posts on Niagara Mohawk v. Chevron, 596 F.3d 112, in the two appeals and remands prior to the Second Circuit’s February decision, the District Court failed to properly address Niagara Mohawk’s (NiMo’s) argument under § 113(f)(3)(B), asserting that it has a
Category: Superfund (CERCLA & State Superfund) |
No Comments »
Tags: CERCLA, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, PRP, superfund
James J. Periconi, Esq. | June 28, 2010
Our last post discussed the Second Circuit’s recent decision in Niagara Mohawk v. Chevron, 596 F.3d 112 (2d Cir. Feb 24, 2010). We left off when the District Court was about to review its prior decision in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper Industries v. Aviall Services (“Aviall”). The Aviall Court held that [...]
Category: Superfund (CERCLA & State Superfund) |
No Comments »
Tags: CERCLA, DEC, EPA, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, potentially responsible party, PRP, superfund
James J. Periconi, Esq. | June 3, 2010
The Second Circuit’s recent decision in Niagara Mohawk Power Corp v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc., 596 F.3d 112 (2d Cir. Feb 24, 2010), is a study (yet again) in the claims available to private parties to
Category: Superfund (CERCLA & State Superfund) |
No Comments »
Tags: CERCLA, chevron, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, niagra mohawk, potentially responsible party, private parties, PRP, recover cost, superfund
James J. Periconi, Esq. | May 28, 2010
I’m speaking about the Gulf of Mexico oil crisis that began in late April, of course. Few environmental catastrophes have shocked the nation more than the huge, continuing, unremitting flow of many thousands of gallons per hour of oil for seemingly an interminable period, with no end in sight. The Deepwater Horizon drilling rig blew
Category: Federal Environmental Law, Oil Spill Cases, Superfund (CERCLA & State Superfund) |
No Comments »
Tags: deepwater horizon, drilling rig, gowanus canal, gulf of mexico, newtown creek, oil spill
James J. Periconi, Esq. | March 10, 2010
On March 2, 2010, the EPA listed the Gowanus Canal in Brooklyn on the National Priorities List (NPL), making it a federal Superfund site. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation urged EPA to consider
Category: Environmental Contamination & General Liability in New York, Federal Environmental Law, Superfund (CERCLA & State Superfund) |
No Comments »
Tags: gowanus canal, industrial waterway, National Priorities List, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, NPL, potentially responsible party, PRP
James J. Periconi, Esq. | December 9, 2009
Following our posts on the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United States, No. 07-1601, –U.S.– (U.S. May 4, 2009) (“BNSF”), this post will discuss implications of this decision on apportionment in Superfund cases as various commentators (including this one) see it.
Category: Superfund (CERCLA & State Superfund) |
No Comments »
Tags: environmental protection agency, EPA, potentially responsible party, PRP, railroads & the environment, sua sponte, us supreme court
James J. Periconi, Esq. | November 13, 2009
Following our recent posts on the Supreme Court’s decision in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United States, No. 07-1601, –U.S.– (U.S. May 4, 2009) (“BNSF“), this post will discuss the implications of
Category: Federal Environmental Law, Superfund (CERCLA & State Superfund) |
No Comments »
Tags: arranger liability, potentially responsible party, PRP, railroads & the environment, Superfund litigation, us supreme court
James J. Periconi, Esq. | August 31, 2009
Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United States: The Supreme Court Clarifies the Requirements for “Arranger” Liability and Allocation of Liability in CERCLA Cases – Part II. As discussed in our prior posting, the Supreme Court recently clarified the requirements for “arranger” liability and allocation of liability in CERCLA cases in Burlington Northern [...]
Category: Federal Environmental Law, New York State Environmental Law, Superfund (CERCLA & State Superfund) |
No Comments »
Tags: arranger liability, CERCLA, railroads & the environment, us supreme court
James J. Periconi, Esq. | July 9, 2009
Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United States: The Supreme Court Clarifies the Requirements for “Arranger” Liability and Allocation of Liability in CERCLA Cases – Part I. The Supreme Court recently clarified the requirements for “arranger” liability and allocation of liability in CERCLA cases in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [...]
Category: Federal Environmental Law, New York State Environmental Law, Superfund (CERCLA & State Superfund) |
No Comments »
Tags: arranger liability, CERCLA, railroads & the environment, us supreme court
James J. Periconi, Esq. | May 26, 2009
The Western District of Washington also recently followed the holding from the Aviall case. See Port of Tacoma v. Todd Shipyards Corp., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5884 (W.D.Wa., January 14, 2009). The Port of Tacoma sued Todd Shipyards in a contribution action under CERCLA § 113(f) for
Category: Federal Environmental Law, Superfund (CERCLA & State Superfund) |
No Comments »
Tags: contribution action, contribution claim, potentially responsible party, PRP, remediating, shipbuilding and environment, Superfund Site