Air Pollution – Soil Vapor Intrusion (6)
Brownfields Cleanup (13)
Environmental Contamination & General Liability in New York (5)
Environmental Law Video (1)
Environmental Permits (1)
Environmental Risk & Insurance (3)
Federal Environmental Law (29)
Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) (13)
Lawyer & Attorney Referrals (2)
Media Appearances (1)
New York Navigation Law (14)
New York State Environmental Law (27)
NY Environmental Statutes, Codes, Regulations (13)
NY Oil Spill Act (14)
NY State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) (3)
Oil Spill Cases (6)
Press Releases (4)
Real Estate Transactions & Environmental Law (26)
Sick Building Syndrome (SBS) (5)
Superfund (CERCLA & State Superfund) (21)
Toxic Substance Control Act – TSCA (1)
Abigail M. Jones, Esq. | March 26, 2012
The Supreme Court of the United States has just unanimously ruled that administrative orders issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) under section 319 of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”) are “final agency actions” subject to judicial review under the Administrative Procedures Act (“APA”). Sackett v. United States EPA, 566 U.S. ____ (2012).
Abigail M. Jones, Esq. | February 22, 2012
In State v. Solvent Chemical Co., 10-2026-cv (2nd Cir. Dec. 19, 2011), the Second Circuit Court of Appeals held that Solvent Chemical Company (“Solvent”) could obtain a declaratory judgment that two adjacent property owners were responsible for future costs incurred by Solvent under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ [...]
James J. Periconi, Esq. | February 13, 2012
So far, in the Periconi, LLC Environmental Law Blog, we’ve discussed what to do before you purchase a contaminated property (see here) and what to do after you’ve purchased a contaminated property (see here), but there is a step that often takes place in between – i.e., between contract signing the closing on the purchase – [...]
James J. Periconi, Esq. | February 7, 2012
We realized, while writing about the new “Continuing Obligations Standards” for contaminated properties (see here), that in order to give a comprehensive picture of what needs to be done if you’re thinking about purchasing a contaminated property, we need to start at the beginning: the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment. This has to take place [...]
James J. Periconi, Esq. | January 31, 2012
New guidelines published in 2011 assist landowners in insuring that they meet all the requirements — specifically the “continuing obligations” — to avail themselves of the landowner liability protections under the federal Superfund Act.
Abigail M. Jones, Esq. | October 3, 2011
In Litgo New Jersey, Inc. v. Martin, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2033 (D.N.J. Jan. 7, 2011) (denying Motion for Rehearing), the sole shareholder of company (a single-purpose entity) that owned a contaminated property was found liable as a “current operator” under CERCLA § 107(a) because he had “actual control over the day-to-day operations on the [...]
Abigail M. Jones, Esq. | September 20, 2011
On June 6, 2011, the Supreme Court of the United States ended a decade of litigation when it denied a writ of certiorari (i.e., refused to review) a 2010 decision of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeal which affirmed the trial court’s decision deny General Electric’s (“GE”) attack on the constitutionality of the U.S. Environmental [...]
Abigail M. Jones, Esq. | August 18, 2011
In DVL Inc. v. General Electric Co., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128810 (N.D.N.Y. Dec. 6, 2010), the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York clarified what constitutes proper use of circumstantial evidence to establish “arranger”
James J. Periconi, Esq. | June 9, 2011
In City of Los Angeles v. San Pedro Boat Works, –F.3d– (9th Cir. Mar. 14, 2011), the Ninth Circuit held that the holder of a revocable permit to operate a boat works, which is a facility for repair, maintenance and rebuilding of ships and boats, is not an owner for purpose of determining who is [...]
James J. Periconi, Esq. | March 29, 2011
In a case decided earlier this month from the U.S. District for Idaho, the Court imposed arranger and operator liability on the United States based on its permitting procedures and requirements at mining operations on federal lands. Nu-West Mining Inc. v. United States, Case No.: 4:09-CV-431 (D. Idaho March 4, 2011). The subject site is [...]
Conservation Buffer Sufficient to Defeat Petitioners’ Standing to Challenge Proposed Development Court Allows Town’s Trespass and Strict Liability Claims against Neighboring Company to Go Forward Under CERCLA, Responsible Parties Liable for Future Clean-Up Costs Revised Standards for Phase II Environmental Site Assessments So, You’re Interested in Purchasing a Contaminated Property (or a Parcel Next to a Contaminated Property): An Overview of Phase I Environmental Site Assessments How to Insure You Get the Landowner Liability Protections under Superfund Environmental Groups Denied Intervention in Suit Regarding RCRA Consent Decree James J. Periconi Named 2011 Environmental SuperLawyer DEC Did Not Act Outside of Its Authority in Promulgating Regulations that Required Cleanup of Contaminated Properties to “Pre-Disposal Conditions” under the State Inactive Hazardous Waste Disposal Site Act 