Air Pollution – Soil Vapor Intrusion (6)
Brownfields Cleanup (13)
Environmental Contamination & General Liability in New York (5)
Environmental Law Video (1)
Environmental Permits (1)
Environmental Risk & Insurance (3)
Federal Environmental Law (29)
Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) (13)
Lawyer & Attorney Referrals (2)
Media Appearances (1)
New York Navigation Law (14)
New York State Environmental Law (27)
NY Environmental Statutes, Codes, Regulations (13)
NY Oil Spill Act (14)
NY State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) (3)
Oil Spill Cases (6)
Press Releases (4)
Real Estate Transactions & Environmental Law (26)
Sick Building Syndrome (SBS) (5)
Superfund (CERCLA & State Superfund) (21)
Toxic Substance Control Act – TSCA (1)
James J. Periconi, Esq. | December 9, 2009
Following our posts on the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United States, No. 07-1601, –U.S.– (U.S. May 4, 2009) (“BNSF”), this post will discuss implications of this decision on apportionment in Superfund cases as various commentators (including this one) see it.
Conservation Buffer Sufficient to Defeat Petitioners’ Standing to Challenge Proposed Development Court Allows Town’s Trespass and Strict Liability Claims against Neighboring Company to Go Forward Under CERCLA, Responsible Parties Liable for Future Clean-Up Costs Revised Standards for Phase II Environmental Site Assessments So, You’re Interested in Purchasing a Contaminated Property (or a Parcel Next to a Contaminated Property): An Overview of Phase I Environmental Site Assessments How to Insure You Get the Landowner Liability Protections under Superfund Environmental Groups Denied Intervention in Suit Regarding RCRA Consent Decree James J. Periconi Named 2011 Environmental SuperLawyer DEC Did Not Act Outside of Its Authority in Promulgating Regulations that Required Cleanup of Contaminated Properties to “Pre-Disposal Conditions” under the State Inactive Hazardous Waste Disposal Site Act 